Daum v. Auburn Memorial Hospital
This text of 198 A.D.2d 899 (Daum v. Auburn Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motions granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motions for summary judgment in this medical malpractice action. Defendants, by competent expert proof, showed their entitlement to summary judgment. In a responding affidavit, plaintiffs expert failed to set forth his medical qualifications. An expert witness must possess the requisite skill, training, knowledge or experience to ensure that an opinion rendered is reliable (Matott v Ward, 48 NY2d 455). Because we have no basis upon which to conclude that plaintiffs expert was qualified to render an expert opinion, plaintiffs proof failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 A.D.2d 899, 604 N.Y.S.2d 449, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daum-v-auburn-memorial-hospital-nyappdiv-1993.