Daughtrey v. Langford

Supreme Court of Florida

Daughtrey v. Langford

81 So. 160, 77 Fla. 72

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 23, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and same is, hereby affirmed.

AH concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and same is, hereby affirmed.

AH concur.

Daughtrey v. Langford, 81 So. 160, 77 Fla. 72 (Fla. 1919).

Pincite

81 So. 160 (Daughtrey v. Langford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.