Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., and Melvin R. Jenkins J. Strother C. Anderson E. Asher David Maddox v. Lonnie M. Saunders

9 F.3d 1544, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35666, 1993 WL 469264
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 15, 1993
Docket93-6536
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 F.3d 1544 (Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., and Melvin R. Jenkins J. Strother C. Anderson E. Asher David Maddox v. Lonnie M. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., and Melvin R. Jenkins J. Strother C. Anderson E. Asher David Maddox v. Lonnie M. Saunders, 9 F.3d 1544, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35666, 1993 WL 469264 (4th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

9 F.3d 1544

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daughton W. LACEY, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
and Melvin R. Jenkins; J. Strother; C. Anderson; E.
Asher; David Maddox Plaintiffs,
v.
Lonnie M. SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-6536.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 25, 1993.
Decided: November 15, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.

Daughton W. Lacey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lacey v. Saunders, No. CA-9296-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 22, 1993; Apr. 15, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F.3d 1544, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35666, 1993 WL 469264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daughton-w-lacey-jr-and-melvin-r-jenkins-j-strothe-ca4-1993.