Daughters v. Queen Insurance Co. of America

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Daughters v. Queen Insurance Co. of America

69 P. 1127, 10 Kan. App. 462, 1900 Kan. App. LEXIS 174

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kansas

DecidedOctober 15, 1900

DocketNo. 439

StatusPublished

This text of 69 P. 1127 (Daughters v. Queen Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daughters v. Queen Insurance Co. of America, 69 P. 1127, 10 Kan. App. 462, 1900 Kan. App. LEXIS 174 (kanctapp 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

By agreement, this action was tried and determined upon the same evidence as that introduced in the case of Daughters v. Insurance Co., ante, p. 458. The records are substantially alike, and the First National Bank was made a party plaintiff in each case. It does not appear to have joined in any of the proceedings subsequent to judgment and is not named as a party in this court. It has asked to be made the plaintiff in error by substitution, as the assignee of the plaintiff’s cause of action. On the authority of Daughters v. Insurance Co., supra, and for the further and in itself quite sufficient reason that the record does not show the filing of the motion for a new trial within three days after the rendition of the judgment, the petition in error will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

By agreement, this action was tried and determined upon the same evidence as that introduced in the case of Daughters v. Insurance Co., ante, p. 458. The records are substantially alike, and the First National Bank was made a party plaintiff in each case. It does not appear to have joined in any of the proceedings subsequent to judgment and is not named as a party in this court. It has asked to be made the plaintiff in error by substitution, as the assignee of the plaintiff’s cause of action. On the authority of Daughters v. Insurance Co., supra, and for the further and in itself quite sufficient reason that the record does not show the filing of the motion for a new trial within three days after the rendition of the judgment, the petition in error will be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 P. 1127, 10 Kan. App. 462, 1900 Kan. App. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daughters-v-queen-insurance-co-of-america-kanctapp-1900.