Daugherty v. State

195 So. 567, 29 Ala. App. 330, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 195
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 1940·No. 5 Div. 103.·Published

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

The barn of one A. J. Roberts, situated .within the curtilage of his dwelling house, Was burned under such circumstances as to warrant the jury in finding that the burning was the work of an incendiary.

Appellant was indicted for the offense; tried, and convicted as charged. Upon appeal to this court, the judgment of conviction was reversed, and the cause remanded to the Circuit Court of Randolph County for further proceedings. Daugherty v. State, 28 Ala.App. 453, 186 So. 780.

There, the trial resulting in the conviction giving rise to this appeal followed.

The errors pointed out by us on the former appeal appear to have been eliminated; and we find riothing worthy of discussion presented on this.

The Attorney General has furbished us an excellent brief, in which he has thoroughly demonstrated 'that no error prejudicial to appellant’s rights occurred throughout the proceedings. But the questions raised are neither new nor novel; and we can see no necessity for our treating them in detail.

The evidence was ample to warrant the question of appellant’s guilt vel non being submitted to the jury. No motion to set aside the verdict was made.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daugherty v. State, 195 So. 567, 29 Ala. App. 330, 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 195 (Ala. Ct. App. 1940).

195 So. 567 (Daugherty v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daugherty v. State
186 So. 780 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1939)