Daugherty v. Latham

174 So. 417, 128 Fla. 271, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1249
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 21, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 174 So. 417 (Daugherty v. Latham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daugherty v. Latham, 174 So. 417, 128 Fla. 271, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1249 (Fla. 1937).

Opinion

Davis, J.

Bill for injunction was filed by the appellant alleging that the County Commissioners of Volusia County, acting under color of authority of Sections 2441, 2445 C. G. L., 1593, 1597 R. G. S., were about to close and abandon a public highway constituting appellant’s only means of ingress and egress without providing another road to the main highway leading to market and outside points as convenient and as practicable as the road now in existence, thereby making it impossible for appellant to transport her farm products and necessities of life to market; that the road about to be abandoned and closed had long been in use and was the only practicable means of ingress and egress to appellant’s homeland farm on which she had resided for about fifty years; that the acts of the respondent County Commissioners were for the benefit of other private property owners and part of a community effort to deprive plaintiff of the road she was then enjoying and had long, since had the^rivilege of using; that all of the acts of defendants below were being perpetrated to plaintiff’s great injury and without making to her, or offering to her, compensation for the damages about to be inflictéd. The Court denied a temporary injunction and dismissed the bill for want of equity. Complainant below appealed.

There was equity in the bill. 29 Corpus Juris, paragraph 232, page 521, and cases cited.

*273 Reversed for appropriate proceedings.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown, J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State, Department of Transportation v. Gayety Theatres, Inc.
781 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Palm Beach County v. Tessler
538 So. 2d 846 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Pinellas County v. Austin
323 So. 2d 6 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Linning v. Board of County Commissioners
176 So. 2d 350 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Central & Southern Florida Flood Control District v. Scott
169 So. 2d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Daugherty v. Latham
190 So. 742 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 So. 417, 128 Fla. 271, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daugherty-v-latham-fla-1937.