Daugherty v. Hamilton

799 N.E.2d 160, 100 Ohio St. 3d 320
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 10, 2003
DocketNos. 2003-1352 and 2003-1497
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 799 N.E.2d 160 (Daugherty v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daugherty v. Hamilton, 799 N.E.2d 160, 100 Ohio St. 3d 320 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The certification of conflict is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The cross-appeal is dismissed as moot.

{¶ 4} The judgment of the court of appeals against Travelers Property Casualty Company is reversed on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daugherty v. Safeco Ins.
804 N.E.2d 43 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
799 N.E.2d 160, 100 Ohio St. 3d 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daugherty-v-hamilton-ohio-2003.