Daugherty v. Gibbs & Carter

2 Posey 255
CourtTexas Commission of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Posey 255 (Daugherty v. Gibbs & Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daugherty v. Gibbs & Carter, 2 Posey 255 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion.— Held, the motion to dissolve the injunction was properly sustained. 1 Tex., 58; 2 Tex., 57.

On the dissolution of the injunction plaintiffs were entitled to require that the petition be continued over for trial or hearing as an original suit. 23 Tex., 292; Dallam, 436. But if the answer denies the equity in the petition it is not error to dismiss the suit, unless the plaintiffs ask that the petition be continued over for trial or hearing as an original petition or suit, which must appear of.record. 12 Tex., 60; 27 Tex., 565.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hansborough v. Towns
1 Tex. 58 (Texas Supreme Court, 1846)
Smith v. Power
2 Tex. 57 (Texas Supreme Court, 1847)
Lively v. Bristow
12 Tex. 60 (Texas Supreme Court, 1854)
Floyd v. Turner
23 Tex. 292 (Texas Supreme Court, 1859)
Baldridge v. Cook
27 Tex. 565 (Texas Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Posey 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daugherty-v-gibbs-carter-texcommnapp-1880.