Daugherty v. Feland

1916 OK 666, 157 P. 1146, 59 Okla. 124, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1137
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 13, 1916·No. 7463·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

On appeal to this court from a judgment of, the district court of Rogers county, a supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error as principals, and T. A. Eakin, .T. A. Garnett, G. B. Merryman, and H. J. Witon as sureties, to stay such judgment. On May 10, 1916, the judgment was affirmed, and motion has been filed in this court for judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond, which motion is sustained under authority of chapter 249, Session Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342. 152 Pac. 1078.

Judgment is therefore entered in this court against T. A. Eakin, J. A. Garnett, G. B. Merryman, and H. J. Witon in the sum of $512.38, with interest at S per cent per an-num from December 31, .1914, and costs, for which let execution issue out of the trial -court.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daugherty v. Feland, 1916 OK 666, 157 P. 1146, 59 Okla. 124, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1137 (Okla. 1916).

1916 OK 666 (Daugherty v. Feland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McIntosh v. Holtgrave
1920 OK 261 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
Pettis v. Johnston
1920 OK 224 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)