Daugherty v. Director of Patuxent Institution

192 A.2d 760, 232 Md. 637, 1963 Md. LEXIS 752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daugherty v. Director of Patuxent Institution. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 Md. 662
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 18, 1963·No. App. No. 6·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this application for leave to appeal from the order of the Criminal Court of Baltimore committing him to Patuxent Institution after a finding of defective delinquency, the petitioner sought leave to appeal as an indigent.

The record shows that the petitioner made oath that he was indigent, but it does not show that there was any hearing on, or determination of, that question by the trial court pursuant to Rule 894 a 2 (b). We must therefore grant the application for leave to appeal, and remand for further proceedings in conformity with the provisions of Code (1962 Cum. Supp.), Art. 31B, § 11A. Crisp v. Director, 231 Md. 616, Colbert v. Director, 232 Md. 634.

Application for leave to appeal granted and case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daugherty v. Director of Patuxent Institution, 192 A.2d 760, 232 Md. 637, 1963 Md. LEXIS 752 (Md. 1963).

192 A.2d 760 (Daugherty v. Director of Patuxent Institution) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crisp v. Director of Patuxent Institution
189 A.2d 117 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)
Colbert v. Director of Patuxent Institution
192 A.2d 759 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)