Daugherty v. Daugherty

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Daugherty v. Daugherty

85 Pa. Super. 421, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 291

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 17, 1925·No. Appeal, 2·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The record shows such material departure from equity Rules, 68 etc., that we are constrained at once to remit the record for reconsideration and disposition in accordance with those rules. The decree entered by the lower court cannot be considered as final. A decree nisi should have first been entered.

Decree reversed and record remitted with a procedendo. Costs of this appeal to abide final determination of the casa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The record shows such material departure from equity Rules, 68 etc., that we are constrained at once to remit the record for reconsideration and disposition in accordance with those rules. The decree entered by the lower court cannot be considered as final. A decree nisi should have first been entered.

Decree reversed and record remitted with a procedendo. Costs of this appeal to abide final determination of the casa

Daugherty v. Daugherty, 85 Pa. Super. 421, 1925 Pa. Super. LEXIS 291 (Pa. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

85 Pa. Super. 421 (Daugherty v. Daugherty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related