Dauel v. Arnold

103 Ill. App. 298, 1901 Ill. App. LEXIS 226
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 20, 1902
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 Ill. App. 298 (Dauel v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dauel v. Arnold, 103 Ill. App. 298, 1901 Ill. App. LEXIS 226 (Ill. Ct. App. 1902).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding J ustioe Burroughs

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a petition filed by Ruth Ann Bunn, executrix, of the last will and testament of Isaac K. Bunn, deceased, in the County. Court of McLean County, against Minor K. Bunn, John L. Bunn, Frank M. Bunn, Louie Hetland and L. S. Hetland, her husband, Hugh W. Bunn, Abraham Bunn, Jeremiah I. Bunn, Mary Paxton and John Paxton, her husband, and Eva J. Cline, and S. E. Cline, her husband, for an order of that court authorizing and empowering the petitioner to sell the real estate of said deceased to pay his debts.

After the petition was filed, the petitioner, Euth Ann Bunn, by leave of court, resigned as such executrix, and John P. Arnold was appointed, and qualified as the administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate of said Isaac K. Bunn, deceased, and by leave of court, he was substituted for her as petitioner, and the petition was amended so as to read as follows :

“Your petitioner respectfully represents that heretofore, to wit, on or about the twenty-first dajr of November, A. D. 1897, the said Isaac K. Bunn, then of said county, departed this life testate, leaving him surviving his widow, Euth Ann Bunn, and Minor K. Bunn, John L. Bunn, Frank M. Bunn, Louie (or Nefa) Hetland, (whose husband’s name is L. S. Hetland,) Hugh W. Bunn, Abraham Bunn, Jeremiah I. Bunn, Mary Paxton, (whose husband’s name is John Paxton.) and Eva J. Cline, (whose husband’s name is 8. E. Cline,) his sole children and heirs at law; each of which said children except said Jeremiah I. Bunn is a devisee under the last will and testament of said Isaac K. Bunn, as is hereinafter set forth; and the said Euth Ann Bunn is a legatee under said last will and testament, as is hereinafter set forth.
Your petitioner further shows that the said Isaac K. Bunn died seized of certain lands situate in the county of McLean aforesaid, known and described as follows, to wit: the east half of the northwest quarter of section twenty; the north half of the west half of the southwest quarter of section twenty; the south half of the west half of the southwest quarter of section twenty; the west half of the northeast quarter of section twenty; the east half of the northeast quarter of section twenty-one; the west half of the northeast quarter of section twenty-one; the west half of the northwest quarter of section twenty (20) and the east half of the southwest quarter of section twenty (20). All of said lands lying and being in township twenty-four north, range five, east of the third P. M. Said testate was not seized of any lands other than those above specified at the time of his decease.
Your petitioner further shows that at the time of his decease the said testator was the owner of and was possessed of sixty-three shares of the capital stock of the bank of Colfax, in said county of McLean. Tour petitioner shows that of said lands a certain part, as hereinafter stated, were incumbered at the time of the decease of said Isaac K. Bunn by a certain mortgage executed by himself and wife to one Abraham Brokaw for the principal sum of $5,728 with interest thereon, which said interest is somewhat in arrears, as is hereinafter stated, but the entire amount of said principal of said mortgage indebtedness except $728 of the principal heretofore paid thereon, remains and is wholly unpaid.
Tour petitioner further shows that prior to his decease, the said Isaac K. Bunn, joined by his wife, said Buth Ann Bunn, prepared, signed, sealed and acknowledged certain deeds to his children, respectively (except to said Jeremiah I. Bunn), as follows;
To said John L. Bunn, the said east half of the northwest quarter of section twenty;
To said Mary Paxton, the said east half of the southwest quarter of section twenty;
To said Eva J. Cline, under her then maiden name of Bunn, the said north half of the west half of the southwest quarter of section twenty;
To said Minor K. Bunn (under the name of M. K. Bunn) the said south half of the west half of the southwest quarter of section twenty;
To said Abraham Bunn (under the name of Abe Bunn) the said west half of the northeast quarter of said section twenty;
To Prank M. Bunn, the said east half of the northeast quarter of section twenty-one;
To said Buth Ann Bunn, for the term of her natural life,the said west half of the northeast quarter of section twenty-one, with remainder at her death to said Hugh W. Bunn in fee simple;
To said Buth Ann Bunn, the said west half of the northwest quarter of said section twenty (20) for the term of her natural life, with remainder at her death to said Mrs. Louie (or Ueva) Hetland in fee simple, which said life estates were so provided in consideration of the release and waiver by her, said Buth Ann Bunn, of her dower and homestead rights in and by said respective deeds, and not by way of gift or devise.
Your petitioner further shows that no one of said deeds of conveyance was .executed by delivery during the lifetime of said Isaac K. Bunn, but remained and continued in the possession, custody and control of him, said Isaac K. Bunn, up to and at the time of his decease, as hereinafter more fully stated and set forth.
Tour petitioner further shows that thereafter, to wit, upon the fourth day of January, A. D. 1898, the last will and testament of the said Isaac IL Bunn was duly admitted t.o probate in your honor’s said court, and still remains and is in full force and effect; and that on, to wit, the day and year last aforesaid, the said Ruth Ann Bunn was duly appointed by your honor’s court the executrix of said last will and testament.
Tour petitioner further shows that in and by said last will and testament it was, among other things, provided, that said deeds of conveyance should he delivered to said grantees therein named respectively, after the decease of the said testator; that said life estates to said Ruth Ann Bunn were in payment and in consideration of her release of dower and homestead in the deeds aforesaid other than those in which she is one of the grantees as aforesaid. Tour petitioner further shows that in and by said last will and testament, the said Ruth Ann Bunn is given and bequeathed sixty-three shares of the capital stock in the State Bank of Colfax of the par value of $100 each, which said shares of stock were worth their par or face value.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harlan National Bank v. Brown
317 S.W.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Ill. App. 298, 1901 Ill. App. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dauel-v-arnold-illappct-1902.