Daue v. Royal Mining & Milling Co.

98 S.E. 96, 23 Ga. App. 265, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 71
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1919
Docket9839
StatusPublished

This text of 98 S.E. 96 (Daue v. Royal Mining & Milling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daue v. Royal Mining & Milling Co., 98 S.E. 96, 23 Ga. App. 265, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 71 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

There was evidence to support the verd'iet, and none of the numerous special grounds of the motion for a new trial show such harmful error as to require a reversal.

-Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E. 96, 23 Ga. App. 265, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daue-v-royal-mining-milling-co-gactapp-1919.