Daubner v. McFarlin
This text of 117 N.W. 1002 (Daubner v. McFarlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cáse presents merely questions of fact as to which the evidence was, to say the least, fairly conflicting. This court ought not to be burdened, in the performance of its duty to important litigation, by the necessity of examining such questions. Counsel ought to be able to restrain clients from the bringing of such necessarily futile appeals. We discover no clear preponderance of evidence against the findings of the trial court.
■By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 N.W. 1002, 136 Wis. 515, 1908 Wisc. LEXIS 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daubner-v-mcfarlin-wis-1908.