Daubert v. Eckert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Daubert v. Eckert

94 Pa. 255

DecidedMarch 22, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 94 Pa. 255 (Daubert v. Eckert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Daubert v. Eckert, 94 Pa. 255 (Pa. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme court was entered,

Per Curiam.

If, as was settled in Haffey v. Carey, 23 P. F. Smith 481, a married woman can mortgage her land to secure the future indebtedness of her husband, it is not easy to understand why she may not give the money raised by the mortgage immediately to him. The mortgagee has nothing to do with the application of the mortgage money. All that is necessary is that the husband and wife should join in the execution, and that she should be separately examined and acknowledge the instrurinent in the manner prescribed by law.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the Supreme court was entered,

Per Curiam.

If, as was settled in Haffey v. Carey, 23 P. F. Smith 481, a married woman can mortgage her land to secure the future indebtedness of her husband, it is not easy to understand why she may not give the money raised by the mortgage immediately to him. The mortgagee has nothing to do with the application of the mortgage money. All that is necessary is that the husband and wife should join in the execution, and that she should be separately examined and acknowledge the instrurinent in the manner prescribed by law.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 Pa. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daubert-v-eckert-pa-1880.