Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck

808 A.2d 1135, 261 Conn. 942, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 414

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 3, 2002·No. SC 16848·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 71 Conn. App. 600 (AC 21701), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[943]*943The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16848. Richard T. Stabnick, in support of the petition. Decided October 3, 2002

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly substitute its own factual findings for those of the workers’ compensation commissioner?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner or should the Appellate Court have remanded the issues?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 71 Conn. App. 600 (AC 21701), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[943]*943The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16848. Richard T. Stabnick, in support of the petition. Decided October 3, 2002

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly substitute its own factual findings for those of the workers’ compensation commissioner?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner or should the Appellate Court have remanded the issues?”

Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck, 808 A.2d 1135, 261 Conn. 942, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 414 (Colo. 2002).

Pincite

808 A.2d 1135 (Daubert v. Borough of Naugatuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related