Dattoma v. Turiano
536 So. 2d 1037, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1633, 1988 WL 36842
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 1988
DocketNos. 4-86-1705, 4-86-1706
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 536 So. 2d 1037 (Dattoma v. Turiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dattoma v. Turiano, 536 So. 2d 1037, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1633, 1988 WL 36842 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
We sua sponte consolidate these two appeals and affirm. We believe the trial court did have jurisdiction to adjudicate these claims. See Northeast Bank of Clearwater v. Bentley, 413 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). We also reject the other claims of error asserted by appellants and find competent substantial evidence in the record to support all of the rulings of the trial court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Louis
571 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. LaSalla
536 So. 2d 1037 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
536 So. 2d 1037, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1633, 1988 WL 36842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dattoma-v-turiano-fladistctapp-1988.