D'Atri v. Vignalats
557 P.2d 272, 92 Nev. 748
This text of 557 P.2d 272 (D'Atri v. Vignalats) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
D'Atri v. Vignalats, 557 P.2d 272, 92 Nev. 748 (Neb. 1976).
Opinion
OPINION
Although appellants contend the district court erred in granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment, they have faded to demonstrate error, as contemplated by our rules, through briefs citing pertinent portions of the record and relevant authority. Accordingly, we will not consider their contentions. Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Feldman v. State
615 P.2d 238 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
557 P.2d 272, 92 Nev. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/datri-v-vignalats-nev-1976.