D'Atri v. Vignalats

557 P.2d 272, 92 Nev. 748
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1976·No. No. 8938·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Although appellants contend the district court erred in granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment, they have faded to demonstrate error, as contemplated by our rules, through briefs citing pertinent portions of the record and relevant authority. Accordingly, we will not consider their contentions. Holland Livestock v. B & C Enterprises, 92 Nev. 473, 553 P.2d 950 (1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'Atri v. Vignalats, 557 P.2d 272, 92 Nev. 748 (Neb. 1976).

557 P.2d 272 (D'Atri v. Vignalats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Feldman v. State
615 P.2d 238 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)