Datcard Systems, Inc. v. Pacsgear, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Datcard Systems, Inc. v. Pacsgear, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 16, 2014

Docket20-1041

StatusUnpublished

This text of Datcard Systems, Inc. v. Pacsgear, Inc. (Datcard Systems, Inc. v. Pacsgear, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Datcard Systems, Inc. v. Pacsgear, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

DATCARD SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PACSGEAR, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________

2013-1445 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 10-CV-1288, Senior Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

PAUL A. STEWART, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was CRAIG S. SUMMERS.

WILLMORE F. HOLBROW, III, Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for de- fendant-appellee. With him on the brief were DENNIS G. MARTIN and JAMES AHN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 16, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI