Datavious Manuel v. State

152 So. 3d 1290, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 192, 2015 WL 71637
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 2015·No. 4D13-4461·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Confession of ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s restitution order. Based on the State’s confession of error, we agree that the trial court should not have issued the order without first conducting a hearing to determine the amount of restitution. Hamrick v. State, 648 So.2d 274, 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Thomas v. State, 517 So.2d 132, 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct a hearing and issue a new restitution order.

Reversed and Remanded.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Datavious Manuel v. State, 152 So. 3d 1290, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 192, 2015 WL 71637 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

152 So. 3d 1290 (Datavious Manuel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JUNIO SAINVIL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
248 So. 3d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)