Data-Guide, Inc. v. American R. D. M. Corp.

18 A.D.2d 995, 238 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4075
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 26, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, entered on June 29, 1962, granting defendant’s motion to [996]*996dismiss the complaint, under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that there is a prior judgment determinative of the issues, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs to any party, the motion denied, and the judgment entered thereon vacated. The statute is explicit (Civ. Prae. Act, § 482). Unless the prior judgment dismissing the complaint before the close of plaintiff’s evidence was expressly declared to be on the merits, it does not bar a subsequent action for the same cause. In this ease, the prior judgment did not so declare, and, of course, it was, rendered prior to any trial or hearing on the merits. A compulsory nonsuit is!not to be confused with a judgment which either determines the merits or, although not determining the merits, determines an issue of fact or of law in abatement or personal to a litigant (cf. Restatement, Judgments, §§ 49, and 50 with § 53, together with respective Comments; see, also, e.g., Linton v. Perry Knitting Co., 295 N. Y. 14, 17). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, Stevens and Steuer, JJ. [35 Misc 2d 704.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Data-Guide, Inc. v. American R. D. M. Corp., 18 A.D.2d 995, 238 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

18 A.D.2d 995 (Data-Guide, Inc. v. American R. D. M. Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franckowiak v. East Greenbush Central School District
67 A.D.2d 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)