Dassler v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.

943 So. 2d 1025, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21243, 2006 WL 3733812
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2006·No. 4D05-4389, 4D06-1422·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

943 So.2d 1025 (2006)

Jimmy Lee DASSLER, Appellant,
v.
BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Appellee.

Nos. 4D05-4389, 4D06-1422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 20, 2006.

Louis Thaler of Louis Thaler, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellant.

John R. Hargrove and Carol A. Gart of Gordon Hargrove & James, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

SHAHOOD, J.

Jimmy Lee Dassler ("appellant") appeals from the Final Judgment entered by the trial court. Appellant argues the trial court erred in entering the Final Judgment because it was obtained without notice to him and therefore void. Appellant further alleges that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his sworn motion for relief from judgment filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540.

Appellee, BellSouth Telecommunications, concedes the trial court erred in entering Final Judgment in its favor due to lack of notice and in denying appellant's rule 1.540 motion. We agree. See Polani v. Payne, 654 So.2d 202, 203-04 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

We therefore reverse the denial of the rule 1.540 motion and vacate the Final Judgment. We remand for further proceedings after appropriate notice to appellant.

Reversed and Remanded.

WARNER and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dassler v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc., 943 So. 2d 1025, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21243, 2006 WL 3733812 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

943 So. 2d 1025 (Dassler v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burrough v. State
943 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)