Daspit Law Firm, PLLC v. Eric Herman and Law Offices of Anjel K. Avant, PLLC D/B/A Avant Law Firm

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 7, 2019·No. 05-19-00615-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered August 7, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00615-CV

DASPIT LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellant

V.

ERIC HERMAN AND LAW OFFICES OF ANJEL K. AVANT, PLLC D/B/A AVANT LAW FIRM, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-19-01463-C

ORDER This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to

abate and motion to compel arbitration. Before the Court is appellant’s August 6, 2019 motion

to extend time to file its brief. Appellant seeks a thirty-day extension because the clerk’s record

omits a contingency fee contract that was signed by Eric Herman and filed as Exhibit 1 to the

motion to abate and motion to compel arbitration. We GRANT the extension motion as follows.

We ORDER Dallas County Clerk John F. Warren to file, no later than August 19, 2019,

a supplemental clerk’s record containing Exhibit 1. We further ORDER appellant to file its

brief within twenty days of the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Mr. Warren and the

parties.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daspit Law Firm, PLLC v. Eric Herman and Law Offices of Anjel K. Avant, PLLC D/B/A Avant Law Firm, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Daspit Law Firm, PLLC v. Eric Herman and Law Offices of Anjel K. Avant, PLLC D/B/A Avant Law Firm (Daspit Law Firm, PLLC v. Eric Herman and Law Offices of Anjel K. Avant, PLLC D/B/A Avant Law Firm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.