Daso v. United Hoisting Co.
247 A.D. 793
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Daso v. United Hoisting Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 A.D. 843 →
Opinion
In an action to recover $10,000, the retirement price of certain preferred stock owned by the plaintiff, under the defendant’s certificate of incorporation and its agreement with plaintiff, order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the separate defense contained in defendant’s answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, that defense is sufficient in law. (Daso v. United, Hoisting Co., Inc., 245 App. Div. 843; affd., 269 N. Y. 659.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daso v. United Hoisting Co., 247 A.D. 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
247 A.D. 793 (Daso v. United Hoisting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daso v. United Hoisting Co., Inc.
200 N.E. 45 (New York Court of Appeals, 1936)
Daso v. United Hoisting Co.
245 A.D. 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)