Daso v. United Hoisting Co.
This text of 247 A.D. 793 (Daso v. United Hoisting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover $10,000, the retirement price of certain preferred stock owned by the plaintiff, under the defendant’s certificate of incorporation and its agreement with plaintiff, order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the separate defense contained in defendant’s answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, that defense is sufficient in law. (Daso v. United, Hoisting Co., Inc., 245 App. Div. 843; affd., 269 N. Y. 659.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D. 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daso-v-united-hoisting-co-nyappdiv-1936.