Dasher v. State
657 So. 2d 1290, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8201, 1995 WL 457184
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 4, 1995·No. No. 95-1131·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
W. SHARP, Judge.
Dasher appeals from the summary denial of his 3.800 motion. He claims he improperly received consecutive habitual sentences for two of his crimes because the two crimes were part of a single episode. Because such a claim is factually based, we affirm the denial without prejudice to his filing of a 3.850 motion. See Massey v. State, 648 So.2d 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Young v. State, 616 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Nowlin v. State, 639 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Dasher’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dasher v. State, 657 So. 2d 1290, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8201, 1995 WL 457184 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
657 So. 2d 1290 (Dasher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caldwell v. State
659 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)