Dasher v. City of Valdosta
This text of 158 S.E. 34 (Dasher v. City of Valdosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. In view of the law and facts the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition in this case upon the principle that a court of equity will not interfere with a criminal prosecution. City of Atlanta v. Gate City Gas Light Co., 71 Ga. 106; Georgia R. &c. Co. v. Atlanta, 118 Ga. 486 (45 S. E. 256) ; Town of Fairburn v. Edmondson, 162 Ga. 386 (134 S. E. 51) ; City of Macon v. Samples, 167 Ga. 150 (145 S. E. 57).
2. The judge did not err in overruling the ground of the demurrer of which complaint is made in the cross-bill of exceptions. The words “indigent,” and “disabled,” as employed in the act exempting veterans of the World War from the payment of the license in question, are terms of sufficiently fixed and definite meaning to obviate any objection to the statute upon the ground that the use of such language is so vague and indefinite as to make the statute void.
Judgment reversed on the main bill of exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 S.E. 34, 172 Ga. 539, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dasher-v-city-of-valdosta-ga-1931.