Dash v. Witsenhuysen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dash v. Witsenhuysen

264 A.D. 766, 35 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4611

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 766 (Dash v. Witsenhuysen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dash v. Witsenhuysen, 264 A.D. 766, 35 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’s motion to strike from defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars ítems: 1 (a), 1 (b), 3 (a), 3 (b), 5 (a), 15 (b), 16 (b) and 17 to 23, inclusive, and that part of item 2 (a) relating to the manner in which the salary was to be paid, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Verified bill of particulars to be served within ten days after service of order with notice of entry thereof. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’s motion to strike from defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars ítems: 1 (a), 1 (b), 3 (a), 3 (b), 5 (a), 15 (b), 16 (b) and 17 to 23, inclusive, and that part of item 2 (a) relating to the manner in which the salary was to be paid, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Verified bill of particulars to be served within ten days after service of order with notice of entry thereof. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 766, 35 N.Y.S.2d 270, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dash-v-witsenhuysen-nyappdiv-1942.