Dash v. Holtz
349 So. 2d 182, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22610
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 1977·No. Nos. 76-1381, 76-1382, 76-1450, 76-1324·Published
Opinion
Affirmed. Rivers v. Brown, 62 Fla. 258, 56 So. 553 (1911); Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co., 83 Fla. 66, 90 So. 821 (1922); and see Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc., 145 So.2d 565 (Fla.3d DCA 1962).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dash v. Holtz, 349 So. 2d 182, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22610 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
349 So. 2d 182 (Dash v. Holtz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc.
145 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Rivers v. Brown
62 Fla. 258 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.
90 So. 821 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)