Dash v. Holtz
349 So. 2d 182, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22610
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 1977
DocketNos. 76-1381, 76-1382, 76-1450, 76-1324
StatusPublished
This text of 349 So. 2d 182 (Dash v. Holtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dash v. Holtz, 349 So. 2d 182, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22610 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
Opinion
Affirmed. Rivers v. Brown, 62 Fla. 258, 56 So. 553 (1911); Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co., 83 Fla. 66, 90 So. 821 (1922); and see Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc., 145 So.2d 565 (Fla.3d DCA 1962).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rothstein v. Forty-Five, Twenty-Five, Inc.
145 So. 2d 565 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Rivers v. Brown
62 Fla. 258 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1911)
Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.
90 So. 821 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
349 So. 2d 182, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dash-v-holtz-fladistctapp-1977.