Daryll Gooding v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 2019·No. 18-4348·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-4348

DARYLL GOODING, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

March 28, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s “motion to correct illegal sentence 3.800(a)” is treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and is dismissed. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Daryll Gooding, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daryll Gooding v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Daryll Gooding v. State of Florida (Daryll Gooding v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)