Daryl Green v. Prince George's County Office of Child Support

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 2023
Docket22-1705
StatusUnpublished

This text of Daryl Green v. Prince George's County Office of Child Support (Daryl Green v. Prince George's County Office of Child Support) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daryl Green v. Prince George's County Office of Child Support, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1705 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1705

DARYL ANTHONY GREEN,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT; PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT,

Creditors - Appellees,

and

TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:21-cv-02441-PJM)

Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daryl Anthony Green, Appellant Pro Se. Karen Hess Rohrbaugh, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Timothy P. Branigan, LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, Laurel, USCA4 Appeal: 22-1705 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 3

Maryland for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-1705 Doc: 34 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:

Daryl Anthony Green appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing his appeal

from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case, and

(2) imposing a prefiling injunction against him. With respect to the dismissal order, we

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error and no abuse of discretion. See Fed.

R. Bankr. P. 8003(a)(2); In re SPR Corp., 45 F.3d 70, 74 (4th Cir. 1995); In re Serra

Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir. 1992). We also find no abuse of discretion

by the district court in imposing monetary sanctions and a prefiling injunction upon finding

that Green engaged in abusive, repetitive, and vexatious bankruptcy filings. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. Green v. Prince George’s Cnty. Ofc. of Child Support,

No. 8:21-cv-02441-PJM (D. Md. June 16, 2022).

We deny Green’s motions: for an extension of time to file transcripts and to amend

his informal brief; to address his appeals from the dismissal of two other bankruptcy court

actions; for judicial notice, to strike the sanctions order, and for leave to file federal

litigation; and for a stay pending appeal and a preliminary injunction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Daryl Green v. Prince George's County Office of Child Support, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daryl-green-v-prince-georges-county-office-of-child-support-ca4-2023.