Daryl Allan Hatfield v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00704-CR
Daryl Allan HATFIELD, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR8888 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 26, 2014
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
On February 21, 2014, the trial court entered a Nunc Pro Tunc in cause number 2012-CR-
8888. On October 14, 2014, Appellant Daryl Allan Hatfield filed a notice of appeal contending
error in the Nunc Pro Tunc.
A judgment nunc pro tunc is an appealable order. Blanton v. State, 369 S.W.3d 894, 903
(Tex. Crim. App. 2012). To perfect an appeal, however, the notice of appeal must be filed within
thirty days of the date that the trial court signs the judgment nunc pro tunc. Dewalt v. State, 417
S.W.3d 678, 689 (Tex. App.—Austin 2013), pet. ref’d, 426 S.W.3d 100 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). 04-14-00704-CR
“If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, the court of appeals has no option but to dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
On October 27, 2014, we ordered Appellant Hatfield to show cause in writing no later than
November 17, 2014, explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
See Blanton, 369 S.W.3d at 903.
No response has been filed. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Daryl Allan Hatfield v. State (Daryl Allan Hatfield v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.