Daryl A. Miller v. At & T Network Systems, an at & T Technologies, Inc., Group

915 F.2d 1404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18240, 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 418
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 18, 1990
Docket89-35783
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 915 F.2d 1404 (Daryl A. Miller v. At & T Network Systems, an at & T Technologies, Inc., Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Daryl A. Miller v. At & T Network Systems, an at & T Technologies, Inc., Group, 915 F.2d 1404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18240, 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 418 (9th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

915 F.2d 1404

60 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 418, 2 A.D. Cases 295

Daryl A. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AT & T NETWORK SYSTEMS, an AT & T Technologies, Inc., Group,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-35783.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 26, 1990.
Decided Oct. 18, 1990.

James M. Brown, Enfield, Guimond & Brown, Salem, Or., for plaintiff-appellant.

Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Spears, Lubersky, Bledsoe, Anderson, Young & Hilliard, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, NELSON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the judgment of the district court and adopt its opinion published in 722 F.Supp. 633 (D.Or.1989).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Robinette
1995 Ohio 162 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
915 F.2d 1404, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18240, 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/daryl-a-miller-v-at-t-network-systems-an-at-t-tech-ca9-1990.