Dary v. Kane
This text of 33 N.E. 527 (Dary v. Kane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By St. 1883, c. 223, § 13, suits in equity may be brought in any county where a transitory personal action between the same parties might be brought. The defendant contends that a bill to redeem land from a mortgage does not come within this provision, and that it can only be brought in the county where the land lies. But such bill is clearly a suit in equity within the meaning of the statute. This is shown conclusively by the form enacted with the statute.
The interest and title of the plaintiff are sufficiently set forth in the bill, which in this respect follows the form enacted with the statute as closely as possible.
The averment of the defendant’s possession is also sufficient.
The plaintiff as administrator of Munnigle’s estate is accountable to Tripp as well as to the defendant, and for this reason the further objections of the defendant will not avail.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 N.E. 527, 158 Mass. 376, 1893 Mass. LEXIS 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dary-v-kane-mass-1893.