Darvoe v. Grow
This text of 188 A.D.2d 1031 (Darvoe v. Grow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memo-
randum: Petitioner commenced this pro se original CPLR article 78 proceeding in the nature of prohibition to vacate two prior Supreme Court judgments. This proceeding is not a proper vehicle to obtain review of prior judgments. We note that the appeal from the first judgment entered September 20, 1990 has been dismissed by our Court, and it does not appear that petitioner ever appealed from the judgment entered January 24, 1992. Prohibition will not lie to litigate issues which could have been raised on direct appeal. (Original [1032]*1032Proceeding Pursuant to Article 78.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 A.D.2d 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darvoe-v-grow-nyappdiv-1992.