Darvin W. Scott v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 2, 2002·No. 04-02-00126-CR·Published

Opinion

No. 04-02-00126-CR
Darvin W. SCOTT,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1992CR2083
Honorable Mary Román, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Alma L. López, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 2, 2002

AFFIRMED

Darvin W. Scott ("Scott") pled true to violating a condition of his community supervision and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Scott's court-appointed attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which she concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Scott with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.

PHIL HARDBERGER,

CHIEF JUSTICE

DO NOT PUBLISH

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darvin W. Scott v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Darvin W. Scott v. State (Darvin W. Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bruns v. State
924 S.W.2d 176 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Nichols v. State
954 S.W.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)