Dartoe v. Overmeyer
134 A.3d 1045, 635 Pa. 252, 2016 WL 1546421, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 810
This text of 134 A.3d 1045 (Dartoe v. Overmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dartoe v. Overmeyer, 134 A.3d 1045, 635 Pa. 252, 2016 WL 1546421, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 810 (Pa. 2016).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habe-as Corpus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 608 Pa. 71, 10 A.3d 282 (2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 A.3d 1045, 635 Pa. 252, 2016 WL 1546421, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dartoe-v-overmeyer-pa-2016.