Dartoe, T. v. Supt. Overmeyer
This text of Dartoe, T. v. Supt. Overmeyer (Dartoe, T. v. Supt. Overmeyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A EASTERN D|STR|CT
THO|\/|AS DARTOE, 1 NO. 10 EM 2016
Petitioner
SUF’ER|NTENDENT, I\/||CHAEL OVER|\/|EYER AT, SC|-FOREST, AND THE D|STR|CT'ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PH|LADELPH|A, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF° PENNSYLVAN|A,
Respondents
PER CUR|AM
AND NOW, this 15th day of Apri|, 2016, the App|ioation for Leave to Fi|e Origina| Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are D|SM|SSED. See Commonvi/ea/th v. A//`, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (exp|aining that hybrid representation is not permitted).
The Prothonotary is D|RECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dartoe, T. v. Supt. Overmeyer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dartoe-t-v-supt-overmeyer-pa-2016.