Dartoe, T. v. Supt. Overmeyer

Opinion

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVAN|A EASTERN D|STR|CT

THO|\/|AS DARTOE, 1 NO. 10 EM 2016

Petitioner

SUF’ER|NTENDENT, I\/||CHAEL OVER|\/|EYER AT, SC|-FOREST, AND THE D|STR|CT'ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PH|LADELPH|A, AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF° PENNSYLVAN|A,

Respondents

PER CUR|AM

AND NOW, this 15th day of Apri|, 2016, the App|ioation for Leave to Fi|e Origina| Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are D|SM|SSED. See Commonvi/ea/th v. A//`, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (exp|aining that hybrid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is D|RECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record