In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-92V Filed: November 17, 2015
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED LAURIE DART, * * Special Master Gowen Petitioner, * * Joint Stipulation on Damages and v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Transverse Myelitis. AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Adriana R. Teitel, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
On January 30, 2015, Laurie Dart (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 17, 2013, she developed transverse myelitis (“TM”). Stipulation for Award at ¶ 2, 4, docket no. 16, filed Nov. 12, 2015. Further, petitioner alleged that she experienced residual effects of her injury for more than six months. Id. at ¶ 4.
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
1 On November 12, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. Respondent denies that the flu vaccination caused petitioner’s TM or any other injury or condition. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties also stipulate to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs in a joint stipulation filed on November 16, 2015. The parties agree to a total award of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $11,500.00. Stipulation for Fees at ¶ 5, docket no. 17, filed Nov. 16, 2015. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner represents that she did not personally incur costs related to this proceeding. Declaration, docket no. 18, filed Nov. 16, 2015. The undersigned finds the stipulation for fees and costs reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court.
The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
1) A lump sum of $90,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Laurie Dart. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
2) A lump sum of $11,500.00, in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Diana Stadelnikas Sedar of Maglio, Christopher & Toale, PA, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e), for attorneys’ fees and costs.
Id. at ¶ 8.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation and attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FED E RA L CLAI MS OFFICE OF SPECIA L M ASTERS
LA U R I E DA RT,
l'clit ium:r,
v. No. I 5-92 \f Spcciul M uster Gowen SECR ETA RY OF HEA LTH A ND ECr: H UM AN SERVICES,
Respondent.
STIPULATION
The parties hereby sl ipu luk lll the following mnllers:
I . Pclil ioncr Laurie Da rt (''petitioner") filed a pclition fo'r \'accinc compensation under
the Nutionnl Vacc ine I njury Com pcnsutio n Prngr:im, 42 U.S.C. § 300u:i-10 lo 34 (t he "Vaccine
Progrnm''). The pclilion seeks eompcnsutiun for injuries nllcgcd ly rclntcd lo pctilioncr's rece i pt
u f' un i n n ucn;w vaccine ("flu"), whid1 vaccine is conlu im:d in !he Vnccinc I njury Table (the
''Tnblc"), 42 C.f-'.R. I00.3 {a).
2. Pet itioner received her n u immun ization on Octobcr 17, 20 1 3. 3. The vnccinc wus adm inistered wi thin lhl! Uni ted Slates.
4. Petilioncr ul lcgcs that sh<: sustn incd a vact:inc-rel:itcd injury diugnoscd as tnmsvcrsc
myel i tis ("TM") thm was cnuscd-in-focl by the n u vacc ine. She f'urlher alleges that she
experienced the n.:siduu l effects of her inj ury for more thun six months
5. Pet itioner represents that there hus been 110 prior uward or settlcm c.:lll or n civi l action
for dnmngc:; :.is a resu lt of" hcr condilinn. 6. Responde11l denies Lhnl pclilinnl!r's a lleged Ttvl nnd res idua l effects were cuust:c.l -i n-
foci by Lhe Ou vacci11e. Rcspo11dc111 further dt:n ics lllUL lht: nu vuct.:ine caused petitioner any
other injury or her cu1-rc11 l cundit io11.
7. Maintaining their nbuvl'-slutcd posit ions, the part ies ncv· rth clcss now agree that the
issues between them shull be sett led uml thnl a decision should be l:nlercd awardi n g the
co111pcnsntion described i n purngrn ph 8 of thi s SLipulu t ion .
8. As soon us pract icublc artcr an entry ol'j11dgmc11t rcllect ing a decision consistent with
the terms of' this Stipu lation , anti al'll!r pc1i1io11cr has filed 1111 ch.:c1io11 to rt:ccive compcnsntiun
pursuam lo 42 U .S.C. § JOOau -21(n)( I ). the Secrclnry ol' Health nnd H umun Services will issue
lhe following vaccine compcnsution puymcnl:
A lump sum of S90,000.UO i n thc form or n check p,1yunlc t o pet itioner. This amount represen ts com pensat ion for:ill damngcs th;ll wou ld be avuilubl l! und er 42 U.S.C. § 300ua- l 5(a).
9. /\s soon as praclicn blc a rtcr tin:entry of judg111c111 on cnt illc:rnent in thi s case, and after
pct i ri oner hns li ll!d both a proper nnc..l t imo.:l y clect iun to receive emnpensa tion pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § JOO:in -2 l (n)( I ), und an appl icatiu11, the parties will subm it lo l'urthcr proceedings bcl'ore
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-92V Filed: November 17, 2015
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED LAURIE DART, * * Special Master Gowen Petitioner, * * Joint Stipulation on Damages and v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Transverse Myelitis. AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Diana Stadelnikas Sedar, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, PA, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner. Adriana R. Teitel, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
On January 30, 2015, Laurie Dart (“petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on October 17, 2013, she developed transverse myelitis (“TM”). Stipulation for Award at ¶ 2, 4, docket no. 16, filed Nov. 12, 2015. Further, petitioner alleged that she experienced residual effects of her injury for more than six months. Id. at ¶ 4.
1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
1 On November 12, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation in which they state that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. Respondent denies that the flu vaccination caused petitioner’s TM or any other injury or condition. Id. at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.
The parties also stipulate to an award of attorneys’ fees and costs in a joint stipulation filed on November 16, 2015. The parties agree to a total award of attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $11,500.00. Stipulation for Fees at ¶ 5, docket no. 17, filed Nov. 16, 2015. In accordance with General Order #9, petitioner represents that she did not personally incur costs related to this proceeding. Declaration, docket no. 18, filed Nov. 16, 2015. The undersigned finds the stipulation for fees and costs reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court.
The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:
1) A lump sum of $90,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Laurie Dart. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).
2) A lump sum of $11,500.00, in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Diana Stadelnikas Sedar of Maglio, Christopher & Toale, PA, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300 aa-15(e), for attorneys’ fees and costs.
Id. at ¶ 8.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation and attorneys’ fees and costs. Accordingly, the clerk of the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FED E RA L CLAI MS OFFICE OF SPECIA L M ASTERS
LA U R I E DA RT,
l'clit ium:r,
v. No. I 5-92 \f Spcciul M uster Gowen SECR ETA RY OF HEA LTH A ND ECr: H UM AN SERVICES,
Respondent.
STIPULATION
The parties hereby sl ipu luk lll the following mnllers:
I . Pclil ioncr Laurie Da rt (''petitioner") filed a pclition fo'r \'accinc compensation under
the Nutionnl Vacc ine I njury Com pcnsutio n Prngr:im, 42 U.S.C. § 300u:i-10 lo 34 (t he "Vaccine
Progrnm''). The pclilion seeks eompcnsutiun for injuries nllcgcd ly rclntcd lo pctilioncr's rece i pt
u f' un i n n ucn;w vaccine ("flu"), whid1 vaccine is conlu im:d in !he Vnccinc I njury Table (the
''Tnblc"), 42 C.f-'.R. I00.3 {a).
2. Pet itioner received her n u immun ization on Octobcr 17, 20 1 3. 3. The vnccinc wus adm inistered wi thin lhl! Uni ted Slates.
4. Petilioncr ul lcgcs that sh<: sustn incd a vact:inc-rel:itcd injury diugnoscd as tnmsvcrsc
myel i tis ("TM") thm was cnuscd-in-focl by the n u vacc ine. She f'urlher alleges that she
experienced the n.:siduu l effects of her inj ury for more thun six months
5. Pet itioner represents that there hus been 110 prior uward or settlcm c.:lll or n civi l action
for dnmngc:; :.is a resu lt of" hcr condilinn. 6. Responde11l denies Lhnl pclilinnl!r's a lleged Ttvl nnd res idua l effects were cuust:c.l -i n-
foci by Lhe Ou vacci11e. Rcspo11dc111 further dt:n ics lllUL lht: nu vuct.:ine caused petitioner any
other injury or her cu1-rc11 l cundit io11.
7. Maintaining their nbuvl'-slutcd posit ions, the part ies ncv· rth clcss now agree that the
issues between them shull be sett led uml thnl a decision should be l:nlercd awardi n g the
co111pcnsntion described i n purngrn ph 8 of thi s SLipulu t ion .
8. As soon us pract icublc artcr an entry ol'j11dgmc11t rcllect ing a decision consistent with
the terms of' this Stipu lation , anti al'll!r pc1i1io11cr has filed 1111 ch.:c1io11 to rt:ccive compcnsntiun
pursuam lo 42 U .S.C. § JOOau -21(n)( I ). the Secrclnry ol' Health nnd H umun Services will issue
lhe following vaccine compcnsution puymcnl:
A lump sum of S90,000.UO i n thc form or n check p,1yunlc t o pet itioner. This amount represen ts com pensat ion for:ill damngcs th;ll wou ld be avuilubl l! und er 42 U.S.C. § 300ua- l 5(a).
9. /\s soon as praclicn blc a rtcr tin:entry of judg111c111 on cnt illc:rnent in thi s case, and after
pct i ri oner hns li ll!d both a proper nnc..l t imo.:l y clect iun to receive emnpensa tion pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § JOO:in -2 l (n)( I ), und an appl icatiu11, the parties will subm it lo l'urthcr proceedings bcl'ore
the spcci nl master 10 awa rd rcasonnblc allorneys' l'ccs and costs in°;11rrcd in rroceecli ng upon this
pet it ion.
I 0. Pet itioner and her nllorncy rcpn.:senl thnt they have idcmifio.:d to rcsromknl a l l
known sources or payment for i1ems or services for whk h the Program i s not primari ly liable
und er·12 U .S.C. § 300aa-15(g), incl ud ing Stutc compcnsali on progra ms. insurnncc policies,
Fed cr:.il or Stnle hea lth benelils program s (other thun Ti tle XI X of'the Social Security 1\ cl (4::!
U.S.C. § 1 3% ct seq.)). or entit ies thal provide ho.:n lth services on a rrc-paid basis. 1 1 . l'aymc11ls rnaclc pursuan l lo paragra ph 8 and any nrnoun t s u wurdcd pursuant t o
puragruph IJ of this Stipu la t ion will he made in nccordnn cc with 42 U.S.C. § 300au-l 5(i), subject
to the nvniln bility of sufficient statutory r1111ds.
12. The parties and t heir allomcys further ngrcc and stipu ln tc lhnt, except for any uwun.J
for anomeys' tees and litigation rnsls and past unrcimbu rsablc c:-: p nsc:s, the money provided
pursuant to this Stipula t ion will be used solely for t hL· bene f i t of pei.itioncr as rnntcmplntcd by u
strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- J 5(a J and (d), nnd subjec t 1.0 t he co11cli tions uf 42 U.S.C.
§ 300:.ia - I S(g) and (h).
I 3. I n return for the paymen ts dcs1.:ri bcd i11 paragraphs 8 nnd 9. petit ioner, in her
individual capacity, and on buhut r ul'her heirs, executors, ndministrntors, successors or ussigns .
docs forever i rrc\'ocnbly and u11co11cJi t ionally rcknse, ncquit nnd di:;clrnrgc the Uni t ed States and
the Secretary of l lculth and Human Scrv iccs from uny and a ll act ions or causus of action
(including agrccmenls, judgments, daims, da111ngcs, loss of scrvics, expenses and all demands
u r whntcvcr k i nd or nn wrc) that hnvc been brought, could huvc been brought, ur could be timel y
brought i n the Cou rt or f edera l Claims, umkr the Nn t ionul Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program, :12 U .S.C. § 300:.ia-IO ct seq .. Oil account of, or i n any way growi ng out of', any nnd all
known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected persona l injuri es to Dr ,!cuth or petitioner resu lti ng
l'rom , or alleged to have resulted from, the llu vaccinnt ion administ ered Oil October 1 7, 2013. ns
n l l egcd by pet i tioner in u pctitiun for vm:ci nc com pcnsation filed on Janua ry 30, 201 5, in the
U n itl·d States Court of f edera l C la i ms as pet it i on No. 1 5-9'.!V.
( 11. I f petitioner should die prior to entry of'judgmclll , t his ag1 cement shall bc void ublc
upon proper nut ii.:e to the Cou rt Ull bclwl r or eit her or both or the pMt ics. 15. I r the special master foils to issue u
o!" lhis Stipulation or if lhc Court orl.-e
dccision lh:11 is in comple1e conformity with the terms ol"this Stipu :niion. then the rort ics'
sclllcmcnt and 1his Stipu la1io11 shall be 1'oiclublc at the sole dis<.:n.:liun ol° either party.
16. This Sti pulation expresses n l'ull and complclc ncgoli1111:d sc:nlcment of l inhility and
c..lamuge s claimed u nder t he Notional Childhood Vnccim: I njury J\cl or 1 986, as amended , cxccrt as ulhcrwise noted i n paragraph 9 ubove. There is absolulely no ngrccmcnl on lhc pan of the
punics hereto to make ;iny payment or to do any ncl ur thi ng other lhnn is herein ex pressly stated
und dearly agrced to. The parties further agree und unctcrsland tha t thl: aw:ml ckscri bed in this
Stipulutiun muy reflect rs compromise ol' thc parties' respective pusil ions us to l iobil i1y and/or
'1111Ullllt or d111nacs, and further, thut n ch:111gc in the nature ur lhe injury or condition or in the
items ol" compcnsntion sought, is not grounds to modil"y or n.:visc this r.grecmcnt.
17. This Stipulmion shnll 1101 be co11struccl ;is an admission by the United Slulcs nr the
Se<.:rctnry or 1-ll'lllth nnd H ll111:11l Services tha t the nu vaccination C(1l1SCU pcl i l ioncr lo uffc r TM
or any other injury.
I R. All right s am!obl ig:11io11s or petit ioner hereunder shall upply equally to rn::ti1ioncr' s
heirs, execut ors, administrutors. successors, und/or ussigns.
END OF STIPU LATION
. I
I I Respectfully su!Jmi llcd,
PETITIONER ' /··
LAi2 -W (,, , ATTORNEY OF HECORD FOR AUTHORIZED l.U!:PRES ENTATIVE PETITIONE R: OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL:
MAGL IO, C1m1STOl'l lER & TO,\LE, PA Deputy Director 1605 fain Street, Su i te 7 10 Torts 13ram:h Surasoln, FL 34236 Civil Division (941) 952-5242 U .S. Dcpn rlm 1nt llf .l u5lice P.O. Box 146 Bc11jumi n Frankl in Station Washington, DC 20044 -0146
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR OF THE SECRET R'i OF HEALTH RESPONDET:
L AND H I ]SU RVIC S:
)l_ _ A. MELISSA H t lJSTON, M.D., M.11.H, FAt\P 1\ DRl /\ NA TE l' , di i Director, Div ision uf' Trial t\llorney I njury Compensation Programs Torts Branch 1 lculthcarc Systems Bureau Ci vil Division U.S. Dcpar1men1 of Health U.S. Dcpur\me111. of Justice and H uman Services P.O. Dox 146 5600 Fishers Lane Bcnjamin r1a11k l i11 Stat ion Parkluwn J3ui l c1 ing, Mai l Stop 1 1 C-26 Wush inglon. DC' 200:.\4 -0 I 4G Rockville, MD 20857 (202) 6 J 6-3
LAURIE DART,
Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. 15-92V Special Master Gowen
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent. /
STIPULATION OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
1. Diana L. Stadelnikas-Sedar is counsel for Petitioner in this case. 2. Petitioner submitted a draft Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs to Respondent’s counsel. 3. During informal discussions, Respondent raised objections to certain items in Petitioner’s draft application. Based on these discussions, Petitioners amended the Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs to request reimbursement in the amount of $11,500.00. Respondent does not object. 4. Pursuant to General Order #9, Petitioner has not incurred any costs in pursuit of the claim. 5. The parties now request that a decision awarding the final attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $11,500.00, payable to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Diana L. Stadelnikas-Sedar be issued. 6. Petitioner requests that the award for attorney’s fees and costs be forwarded to Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, 1605 Main Street, Suite 710, Sarasota Florida 34236. 7. Nothing in this Stipulation, including the amount set forth in paragraph 3, should be construed as an admission, concession, or waiver by either party as to any of the matters raised by Petitioner’s Application for Fees and Costs, including but not limited to the hourly rates requested.
Respectfully submitted:
ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT /s/ Diana L. Stadelnikas Sedar, Esq. /s/Adriana Ruth Teitel, Esq. Diana L. Stadelnikas Sedar, Esq. Adriana Ruth Teitel, Esq. Florida Bar Number 0949061 Trial Attorney MAGLIO CHRISTOPHER & TOALE, PA Torts Branch, Civil Division 1605 Main Street, Suite 710 U.S. Department of Justice Sarasota, FL 34236 Post Office Box 146 888-952-5242 Benjamin Franklin Station fax: 877-952-5042 Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Attorney for the Petitioner Attorney for the Respondent
Dated: November 16, 2015