Dart Industries, Inc. v. Clark

619 A.2d 1130, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 52, 1993 WL 48358
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 12, 1993
DocketNos. 91-356-M.P., 91-439-M.P.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 619 A.2d 1130 (Dart Industries, Inc. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dart Industries, Inc. v. Clark, 619 A.2d 1130, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 52, 1993 WL 48358 (R.I. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order issued to the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this petition for certiorari should not be summarily decided in light of the U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Kraft General Foods, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance, 505 U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2365, 120 L.Ed.2d 59 (1992).

In this case the taxpayer, a Delaware Corporation had challenged assessments made under G.L.1956 (1988 Reenactment) § 44-11-11, 44-11-12 relating to the handling of dividends. Having exhausted its administrative remedies the taxpayer sought relief in District Court under § 8-8-24 from a decision by the Tax Administrator that certain dividends should be included in the state taxpayer’s returns. A petition for certiorari was granted in respect to two identical petitions by the taxpayer. In the meantime the U.S. Supreme Court in the above captioned case issued an opinion that would have a direct bearing on the issues involved. The tax administrator has now filed a petition for instructions indicating that the Kraft case was decided in the company’s favor, and requests that this case be remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in the light of Kraft.

After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing their [1131]*1131counsel in oral argument, it is the conclusion of this court that this case should be remanded to the District Court for reconsideration of the issues in light of Kraft and for a determination of whether Kraft would be applied prospectively only or retroactively also.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dart Industries, Inc. v. Clark
657 A.2d 1062 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 A.2d 1130, 1993 R.I. LEXIS 52, 1993 WL 48358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dart-industries-inc-v-clark-ri-1993.