Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens

730 F.3d 1234, 2013 WL 5200399, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19376
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2013·No. 13-603·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the petitioners’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc. We also have a response. Both pleadings were circulated to all the judges of the court who are in regular active service and who are not recused in this proceeding.

Upon consideration, a poll was requested and the votes were evenly divided. Consequently, the poll did not carry and the en banc petition is denied. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(a) (noting a majority may direct en banc review).

Judges Kelly, Hartz, Tymkovich and Phillips would grant the petition, with Judge Hartz writing the attached formal dissent, in which Judges Kelly, Tymkovich and Phillips join.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens, 730 F.3d 1234, 2013 WL 5200399, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19376 (10th Cir. 2013).

730 F.3d 1234 (Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens
135 S. Ct. 547 (Supreme Court, 2014)
COPE v. Kansas State Board of Education
71 F. Supp. 3d 1233 (D. Kansas, 2014)
Woods v. Standard Insurance Co.
771 F.3d 1257 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)