Darsyn Laboratories v. Lenox Laboratories
This text of 217 F.2d 648 (Darsyn Laboratories v. Lenox Laboratories) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
217 F.2d 648
104 U.S.P.Q. 39
DARSYN LABORATORIES, Inc., Appellant,
v.
LENOX LABORATORIES, Inc., Gamma Chemical Corp., Irving
Biber, Benjamin Pecherer, John Robson, J. Robert
Fisher, Louis L. Zempliner and William Gerlach.
No. 11377.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 9, 1954.
Decided Dec. 23, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; William F. Smith, Judge.
Harry C. Bierman, New York City, for appellant.
Max Mehler, Newark, N.J., for Irving Biber.
Jerome J. Heyman, Plainfield, N.J. (Roger T. McLean, New York City, George F. Hetfield, Plainfield, N.J., on the brief), for Gamma Chemical Corp., J. Robert Fisher and John Robson, for Lenox Laboratories, Benjamin Pecherer and William Gerlach.
Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the district court dismissing its complaint in a suit involving alleged patent infringement and unfair competition in using the plaintiff's trade secrets. The issues in the case are thoroughly discussed and correctly decided in the opinion filed by Judge Smith, 120 F.Supp. 42, to which we need add nothing. For the reasons therein set out the judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 F.2d 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darsyn-laboratories-v-lenox-laboratories-ca3-1954.