Darst v. State

838 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2416, 2003 WL 553549
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 2003
DocketNos. 5D00-2262, 5D00-2459
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 838 So. 2d 661 (Darst v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darst v. State, 838 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2416, 2003 WL 553549 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

UPON REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

The supreme court has quashed our decision in Darst v. State, 816 So.2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), and has remanded the case to this court. State v. Darst, 837 So.2d 394 (Fla.2002). The supreme court’s rationale for its decision is explained in Mills v. State, 822 So.2d 1284 (Fla.2002).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and downward departure sentence.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sellers v. State
838 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2416, 2003 WL 553549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darst-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.