Darst v. State
838 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2416, 2003 WL 553549
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2003·No. Nos. 5D00-2262, 5D00-2459·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
UPON REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT
The supreme court has quashed our decision in Darst v. State, 816 So.2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), and has remanded the case to this court. State v. Darst, 837 So.2d 394 (Fla.2002). The supreme court’s rationale for its decision is explained in Mills v. State, 822 So.2d 1284 (Fla.2002).
Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and downward departure sentence.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Darst v. State, 838 So. 2d 661, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2416, 2003 WL 553549 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
838 So. 2d 661 (Darst v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sellers v. State
838 So. 2d 661 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)