Darryl Williams v. Kimberly J. Maki, County Attorney

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided February 9, 2026·No. 0:26-cv-00183·Unknown

Opinion

UNITDEISDT SRTIACTT EOSF D MISINTRNIECSTO CTOAU RT

Darryl Williams, File No. 26-cv-183 (ECT/DLM)

Petitioner,

v. ORDER

Kimberly J. Maki, County Attorney,

Respondent.

Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation on January 20, 2026. ECF No. 16. No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 16] is ACCEPTED in full. 2. Petitioner Darryl Williams’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. Mr. Williams’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF Nos. 2–3] is DENIED. 5. No certificate of appealability shall issue. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Dated: February 9, 2026 s/ Eric C. Tostrud Eric C. Tostrud United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darryl Williams v. Kimberly J. Maki, County Attorney, (mnd 2026).

Darryl Williams v. Kimberly J. Maki, County Attorney (Darryl Williams v. Kimberly J. Maki, County Attorney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related