Darryl Scott v. Dewey Sowders

826 F.2d 1065, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11127, 1987 WL 38509
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 18, 1987
Docket87-5079
StatusUnpublished

This text of 826 F.2d 1065 (Darryl Scott v. Dewey Sowders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darryl Scott v. Dewey Sowders, 826 F.2d 1065, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11127, 1987 WL 38509 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

826 F.2d 1065

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Darryl SCOTT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dewey SOWDERS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-5079.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 1987.

Before KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and GIBBONS, District Judge.*

ORDER

This pro se Kentucky prisoner appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The petitioner attacked his convictions for first degree burglary and first degree robbery, raising three grounds for relief: 1) the prosecutor breached the plea agreement; 2) the trial judge erred by failing to inform petitioner of his right to withdraw his plea; and 3) counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move for withdrawal of his guilty plea prior to sentencing.

Upon review of the record, we hereby affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion and order filed on January 9, 1987. We agree that petitioner's claims of error do not entitle him to habeas corpus relief.

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Julia Gibbons, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Structured Shelters, Inc. v. Normali (Frank J.)
826 F.2d 1065 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
826 F.2d 1065, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 11127, 1987 WL 38509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darryl-scott-v-dewey-sowders-ca6-1987.