Darryl Raynard Gordon v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 22, 2013·No. 05-12-01520-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered March 22, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01520-CR

DARRYL RAYNARD GORDON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 30600-422

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s March 20, 2013 motion for an extension of time to

file a supplemental brief in support of the brief filed by his attorney. Appellant is not entitled to

hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981).

Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s March 20, 2013 pro se motion.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Darryl Raynard Gordon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Darryl Raynard Gordon v. State (Darryl Raynard Gordon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)