Darryl L. Davis v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 11, 2016
Docket5D15-2507
StatusPublished

This text of Darryl L. Davis v. State (Darryl L. Davis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darryl L. Davis v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DARRYL LEWIS DAVIS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D15-2507

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 15, 2016

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Darryl Lewis Davis, Carrabelle, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Lewis Davis petitions this court for writ of habeas corpus regarding his

convictions and life sentences in two cases. Davis was charged in both cases with

robbery with a firearm. Neither the informations nor the evidence presented in Davis’s

trials alleged that he used any weapon other than a firearm. Separate juries found Davis guilty of robbery with a deadly weapon but made special findings that he did not possess

a firearm during the commission of the crimes.

We hold that it was error to list robbery with a deadly weapon as a lesser-included

offense on the verdict forms in these cases. See Growden v. State, 372 So. 2d 930, 931

(Fla. 1979); Stephens v. State, 396 So. 2d 741, 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Deleon v. State,

66 So. 3d 391, 394-95 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011). Furthermore, the verdicts and special findings

were inconsistent. See Starling v. State, 152 So. 3d 868, 868 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Nettles

v. State, 112 So. 3d 782, 783 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Failure to correct Davis’s convictions,

which resulted in consecutive life sentences, would constitute a manifest injustice.

Accordingly, we grant Davis’s petitions for writ of habeas corpus and remand for

entry of corrected judgments that adjudicate him guilty of robbery with a weapon and

resentencing according to a revised Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet.

PETITIONS GRANTED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Growden v. State
372 So. 2d 930 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Deleon v. State
66 So. 3d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Nettles v. State
112 So. 3d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Starling v. State
152 So. 3d 868 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Stephens v. State
396 So. 2d 741 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Darryl L. Davis v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darryl-l-davis-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.