Darrow v. Moschella

805 So. 2d 1068, 2002 WL 113290
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 2002
Docket4D01-1943
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 805 So. 2d 1068 (Darrow v. Moschella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Darrow v. Moschella, 805 So. 2d 1068, 2002 WL 113290 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

805 So.2d 1068 (2002)

Tony DARROW, Appellant,
v.
Anthony E. MOSCHELLA, Appellee.

No. 4D01-1943.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 30, 2002.

Osborne Walker O'Quinn of Osborne Walker O'Quinn, P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

GROSS, J.

Tony Darrow appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against repeat violence entered pursuant to section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2000). We reverse, because this case did not involve "repeat violence" within the meaning of section 784.046(1)(b), so there was no legal basis for the injunction.

This case began on a golf course on April 18, 2001. Anthony Moschella was playing in a group ahead of Darrow. Darrow felt that Moschella's group was playing *1069 too slowly. He yelled out, "Let's go, stop looking for balls." Moschella then got into his cart and drove back to confront Darrow.

We view the facts in the light most favorable to Moschella, the prevailing party below. Moschella testified that when he got out of the golf cart, Darrow came up and bumped him in the chest, causing Moschella to back up. Darrow then approached Moschella again. The brim of his hat hit Moschella's forehead. Moschella knocked the hat off and then Darrow hit him five or six times. After a brief pause, Darrow came at Moschella again, but was restrained by other golfers.

Section 784.046(2) creates a cause of action for an injunction for protection in cases of "repeat violence." Section 784.046(1)(b) defines repeat violence:

"Repeat violence" means two incidents of violence or stalking committed by the respondent, one of which must have been within 6 months of the filing of the petition, which are directed against the petitioner or the petitioner's immediate family member.

In this case there was only one "incident" of violence within the meaning of section 784.046(b). The stages of Darrow's confrontation with Moschella were not separated by time or distance. Prior to their golf course encounter, Darrow had never had any dealings, direct or indirect, with Moschella.

REVERSED.

WARNER and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sean Beatty v. Kathryn Keough
2022 VT 41 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2022)
MARK ADAMCZYK v. SUSAN HERMAN
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
Access Insurance Planners, Inc. v. Gee
175 So. 3d 921 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Levy v. Jacobs
69 So. 3d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Gasilovsky v. Ben-Shimol
979 So. 2d 1179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Blue Paper, Inc. v. Provost
914 So. 2d 1048 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 1068, 2002 WL 113290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darrow-v-moschella-fladistctapp-2002.