Darrough v. Rodgers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Darrough v. Rodgers

411 S.W.3d 866, 2013 WL 5739801, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1255

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. WD 75232·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Freddie Darrough (“Darrough”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict, which found in favor of Dr. William Blake Rodgers (“Dr. Rodgers”) and Spine Midwest, Inc. (“Spine Midwest”) (collectively “the Defendants”). Because we conclude that certain of Darrough’s claims on appeal have not been preserved for our review and that as to her remaining claims, Dar-rough has either failed to establish an abuse of discretion by the trial court or prejudice as a result of the exclusion of evidence, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Freddie Darrough (“Darrough”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict, which found in favor of Dr. William Blake Rodgers (“Dr. Rodgers”) and Spine Midwest, Inc. (“Spine Midwest”) (collectively “the Defendants”). Because we conclude that certain of Darrough’s claims on appeal have not been preserved for our review and that as to her remaining claims, Dar-rough has either failed to establish an abuse of discretion by the trial court or prejudice as a result of the exclusion of evidence, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Darrough v. Rodgers, 411 S.W.3d 866, 2013 WL 5739801, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1255 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

411 S.W.3d 866 (Darrough v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.