D'Arros's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

D'Arros's Appeal

89 Pa. 51, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 98

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 3, 1879

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 Pa. 51 (D'Arros's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D'Arros's Appeal, 89 Pa. 51, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 98 (Pa. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered March 3d 1879.

Per Curiam.

The evidence printed in the appellant’s paper-book is headed “Summary of Testimony.” It is clear that to enable this court to review the findings of fact in the court below, the entire evidence should be brought up. The present appellant did not file exceptions, and the executor who did has not appealed. He is the only party aggrieved by the surcharge of the collateral inheritance tax, and that exception is not before us. We think, however, though the appeal might be dismissed on these grounds without going further, that the conclusion arrived at by the learned court, from the facts as found by the auditing judge, was entirely right.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered March 3d 1879.

Per Curiam.

The evidence printed in the appellant’s paper-book is headed “Summary of Testimony.” It is clear that to enable this court to review the findings of fact in the court below, the entire evidence should be brought up. The present appellant did not file exceptions, and the executor who did has not appealed. He is the only party aggrieved by the surcharge of the collateral inheritance tax, and that exception is not before us. We think, however, though the appeal might be dismissed on these grounds without going further, that the conclusion arrived at by the learned court, from the facts as found by the auditing judge, was entirely right.

Decree affirmed, and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 Pa. 51, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darross-appeal-pa-1879.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack