DARRIN RUDOLPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 2017
Docket16-3371
StatusPublished

This text of DARRIN RUDOLPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DARRIN RUDOLPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DARRIN RUDOLPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DARRIN RUDOLPH, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D16-3371

[August 24, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Paul L. Backman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98002632 CF10B.

Darrin Rudolph, Florida City, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
DARRIN RUDOLPH v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/darrin-rudolph-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.